It’s pretty cute - has some nice logic to it, even if not very difficult.
Edit: the two very different solutions are pretty interesting, actually. Not necessarily the hallmark of a good level, but certainly interesting in their own right.
Wow, that solution was surprisingly simple. I have no idea why I struggled so long and only managed a 4-off when I first tried this a little while ago. I think it may just be another case of trying too hard to optimize and not considering the most obvious solution. :)
It's OK. A few parts feel like slightly interesting distractions that make you think you'll need them, but then you don't. It may have been a little more interesting if there was something more to those parts. One area is just unutilized, and there's only one place that can really be optimized much. But it's just OK IMO.
Wow, that's a brilliantly clever 58. Very well done to Reach, that took me forever to see. Level itself is OK, but has to get some credit for containing that very nice logic.
In the same camp as Reach. This is just some nonsense lol. I tried every possible order here except for the correct one and they were all 4 off for some reason. Very interesting.
Most of the level is just time-wasting, which isn't particularly fun. The bit near the later middle is a little interesting, and has some neat optimization, but that's really the only valuable part of the level.
Similar to the first one - the logic here was pretty straightforward (with a few places you could lose steps that weren't too hard to avoid), but it was fun to execute. Not a bad level.
Agree with hihi. I kept thinking what I was doing would save steps, and it just ended up costing me 2 or 4 more. There was one time save that I failed to notice that led me to a 2-off, but other than that everything went pretty much how the level makes you think it's going to go.
Insights