logo
Wish there was a way to get 96.
2 years ago
3-F
Nice one. The messiness of this level makes the solution harder to see.
(11 years ago) Wow, I got this one 1st try - rare case. Still a nice level, though. :) **************************************** EDIT, 26th Aug.,2022: re-beaten, but not in 1 try, hahahah. Took me 14 tries, this time. So, it WAS luck, years ago. Very cute level! Giving it 5 stars, now. And just like hi19, I am puzzled how this was shorter, too.
Quite an enjoyable pile of 2-off false paths. It's easy to miss an optimization on the correct route and write it off as yet another red herring.
2 years ago
Broken
2 years ago
Radiation
Tricky as hell. Many false paths, 2 offs, ''calling for optimisation'', misleading as F****. :)) And very well hidden right path, for 36. GREAT level!
2 years ago
Radiation
I finally got that one, after long long time. What helped me now is that I was almost certain about the winning route, so I was focusing on finding the optimization trick on that specific route. With my experience from other boards, I studied it and spotted a possibility. It worked! :D
2 years ago
Nucleus
Was fun to figure out the path, but I'm not sure where the missing 2 steps were.
How tight the right hand side is means some things are a bit forced but there are some good cuts in there.
2 years ago
Nucleus
About 10 tries. Never found the 2-off.
Previous
20 of 42
Next